Skip to main content

L'Histoire d'Adèle H.

Picture: Uiversity of Toronto

 So while I'm in Mark Kermode-mode, what about Truffaut's 1975 film, L'Histoire d'Adèle H? The Adèle in question is the younger daughter of Victor Hugo who is traumatised by the death by drowning of her older sister, whom she considers to be her father's favourite. In fact, after the death of Léopoldine and her husband, Victor Hugo had treated his second daughter with increasing coldness. Adèle, played by Isabelle Adjani in her first cinema role, has fallen in love with an English officer, Albert Pinson, who has been posted to Halifax, Nova Scotia. Adèle follows him there, partly also to assert her independence from her father.

When the object of her affection turns her down, she obsessively stalks him and does everything she can to win his love, even though he has made it plain he does not want her. He himself is a rather unreliable and feckless character. Her obsession gradually turns to madness and even makes her sick. When the officer is posted to the West Indies, she follows him there, without even revealing her presence to him. When he follows her and approached her in the street, she does not even recognise him. A local woman takes Adèle under her wing and eventually she returns to Paris.

Adèle's story was recounted in the Diary of Adèle Hugo by Frances Vernor Guille, which Truffaut used to produce a screenplay with Jean Gruault. Adèle's encoded diary only came to light in the 1960's when it was written up by the aforementioned American academic.

It is easy to see what attracted Truffaut to this story. In Jules et Jim, the Jeanne Moreau character Catherine is driven by obsessive love to murder and suicide. In this case, Adèle is driven to madness by her extreme emotional obsession. It is a theme which Truffaut would return to later in his career.

Again, Truffaut uses a true story as his source. He admitted that he was attracted to the story because Adèle was the daughter of the most famous man in the world at that time. Characters who are also cut off emotionally from society also appeal to him.

Don Allen in Finally Truffaut writes:

"Adèle's resistance finds expression in the most romantic, intransigent, absolute and hopless love, which leads her through scandal and humiliation into madness."

Casting Isabelle Adjani was a risk, but she is beautiful and tormented, loved by the camera. The film is all about her, with the rest of the (mainly English) cast secondary. The narrative is, once again, careful, largely undramatic and atmospheric. There is a good sense of the isolation and hostility of the Canadian environment, from the opening night-time scene as she arrives in Halifax by boat. (Most of the film was shot in Guernesey, since an English look was needed.) The film also looks good thanks to the cinematography of Nestor Almendros.

Truffaut makes a slightly gratuitous, Hitchcockian appearance as an English officer whom Adèle mistakes for her would-be lover.

Although very watchable and atmospheric, based on a single viewing, this is not one of my Truffaut favourites. I do not find the subject matter especially fascinating. It is frustrating to see the Adjani character wasting her life and making herself ill when she could have been happy with the local bookshop owner who clearly cares for her. It is not clear why Adèle loves Pinson and I wonder how many people in life allow their emotional obsession to dominate themselves so much. Adjani is excellent, but the dialogue of the rest of the cast seems rather stilted. Perhaps Truffaut's poor grasp of English was not up to getting the best from his English performers.

By the way, why Adèle H? Truffaut said that, although Victor Hugo was well known, many people go to watch a film without much prior knowledge, and since her relationship with Victor Hugo is only revealed half way throught he movie, he thought it better not to advertise the fact in the title.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,