Skip to main content

"Resources panic"

My colleagues in the department have recently commented on what they call 
"resources panic". I know what they mean. We seem to have such a huge range of 
resources: powerpoints, web sites, worksheets, songs, text 
book exercises, CDs and games, that you sometimes feel snowed under. "Back in 
the day" had a text book to work with, cassette, repromasters, worksheets you produced 
and, if you tried hard, the occasional recording from French long wave radio! 
The problem now is not where to find stuff, but choosing from the plethora of 
resources available.

Our approach to the scheme of work (or is it a "scheme of learning" now?) is to 
have a thick ring-binder for each year group with most of our sheets and 
references to other materials all in one place. The SoW is not one in which 
every lesson is mapped out hour by hour. Because we see pupils four or even 
five times a week for 40 minutes at a time, it makes more sense to plan some 
lessons ahead, but to adapt as you go along. I also like the idea of allowing 
my colleagues some scope for creativity. I'd hate to think we all did the same 
thing all the time. If we just had two sessions of one hour or 70 minutes a 
week, I would be tempted to be more prescriptive.
 
I pick up loads of good ideas from people's blogs, twitter links, emails etc,
but I only end up using a small minority of them, partly because, like many
teachers, I have a limited repertoire of practices which I know work well,
and partly because I am stuck in my ways!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,