Skip to main content

EasiSpeak microphone lesson

I finally got round to doing a lesson with the Easispeak USB microphones today with my Y8 class. I just got them to read aloud a passage I had practised with them. One microphone between two with an instruction sheet and a passage to read. After group repetition they recorded their voices and listend back, either directly from the microphone's headphone socket, or from the computer with Audacity. They could then save their recordings in their My Documents folder.

Very basic really, but the class enjoyed the lesson more than usual and got a good deal of reading aloud done. Some went on the read some café dialogues from the text book.

The EasiSpeak mikes worked well and the sound quality was good. I'll have another go with the mikes in a few weeks. Important to keep the idea fresh, I think.

Comments

  1. Hello Mike
    I have enjoyed using Easi-speak micros with classes. I have found it harder to use when I need to delete - can be fiddly to find out how to do certain actions. Some lower ability classes have responded very well to it and tried to talk far more (in French!) than usual! They have also loved using a microphone and Audacity - they turned out to know far more than me about recording and they know how to add more layers and music and voice alteration... I think it could be very motivating too.
    Regards
    Valerie

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi valerie - just to say that I'm Steve, not Mike!! Ha ha!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g