Skip to main content

A nifty “listening plus” lesson plan.

This is written in conjunction with Gianfranco Conti who provided the main idea from listening expert Larry Vandergrift (no longer with us). The main aim is to develop listening skills, but the lesson sequence suggested below also involves jigsaw reading and oral communicative activities.

These are Vandergrift's (2003) instructions for the initial listening-focused activity:

1. The listening scripts should be taken from the course book of the learners or related to its themes. Then it is rewritten into sequential statements which are jumbled to be ordered afterwards by the students.

2. Students work individually and predict the correct order of the statements and write the correct order in the Before Listening: My Choice column (see below).

3. Students work in pairs and discuss any difference in their answers. Then they should agree on a final order and write it down in the Before Listening: Our Choice column.

4. Students listen for the first time and check their prediction of  the statement sequence. According to what they hear, in pairs, they should write the correct order of the events in the After Listening column. At this point, they should discuss what they understand and the difficult listening parts they need to pay more attention to when they listen for the second time.

5. When listening for the second time, learners confirm their answers. This is followed by a class discussion in order to verify the correct sequence and to share the strategies  students use for predicting and understanding the listening script.

6. The aim of the listening for the third time is to finalize their answers and clarify the ambiguous points based on the class discussion in the previous step.

7. Eventually, learners individually complete the Self-Reflection column. They write a reflection on their performance specifically what they achieve in the current task and what they are planning to improve in similar listening tasks in the following class. Here is Gianfranco’s table for students:



Next part

Now that that the students are familiar with the text you can then use that same text as a basis for some communicative practice. Activities you could consider include:


- Reading aloud, e.g. paired reading aloud.
- Traditional question-answer with or without hands up.
- Correcting false statements with or without hands up.
- Aural gap-fill (where the text is hidden, you read aloud from the beginning, leaving gaps for students to fill orally. These can be individual words or longer chunks.
- Antonym and synonym work.
- Dictation.
- Telling the story from another viewpoint (if the text lends itself to this).

In sum, we have a multi-skill lesson sequence with a particular focus on detailed listening and during which a huge amount of language is recycled in various ways, providing variety, challenge and interest.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics