Skip to main content

New A-level revision booklets on frenchteacher

This is just to make you aware of a resource which A-level French teachers might find very useful for students.

I have posted an 82 page revision booklet covering the first six AQA sub-themes (AS-level or the first year of the A-level course). These are:


  • Family
  • Cyber-society
  • Cinema
  • Contemporary music
  • Volunteering
  • Cultural heritage

The booklet is in effect a compendium of listening and reading worksheets which you can already find on the site, some of which you may have used. I have provided nearly all the answers at the back of the booklet, with a few exceptions - notably song lyrics (copyright) and a very few older sheets for which I never produced answers in the first place.

I would anticipate this booklet being handed out for revision in the run-up to exams or being used in class, led by the teacher from the front.

The listening material is mostly in the form of video listening sheets linked to online sources, but there are a couple of audio worksheets (using Audio Lingua authentic recordings as the source) and a couple of texts which the teacher would need to read aloud or record.

Reading material is in the form I usually publish: a text or texts followed by vocab to complete and a range of comprehension, lexical work, matching, translation both ways, summary, gap-fill and so on. There are opportunities for oral explanation too.

I have chosen worksheets to suit the new emphasis on cultural knowledge (AO4) so there is ample material here to support students with this.

I am about to start work on the remaining sub-themes. This should be posted in a few days.

Don't forget that there are are all sorts of other A-level resources on the site to help your students, including plenty of grammar worksheets, translations, oral booklets and vocab lists.

UPDATE: the second booklet is now complete and uploaded.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g